This map shows where AWM can be the entry point for improving livelihoods and where to prioritize investments in AWM to have the maximum impact on rural livelihoods. High potential areas are those showing the highest potential for AWM investment. These areas are identified on the basis of three guiding principles: 1) where water is available 2) where the target beneficiaries are mostly located; and 3) where agricultural water management is key for livelihoods.

This map shows where AWM can be the entry point for improving livelihoods and where to prioritize investments in AWM to have the maximum impact on rural livelihoods. High potential areas are those showing the highest potential for AWM investment. These areas are identified on the basis of three guiding principles: 1) where water is available 2) where the target beneficiaries are mostly located; and 3) where agricultural water management is key for livelihoods.

This map shows areas suitable for the Agricultural Water Management interventions as identified by the project. The assessment is based primarily on each intervention's bio-physical requirements (such as: climate, proximity to water resources, terrain), but it also includes a qualitative rating based on socio-economic settings (namely distance to markets).

This dataset represents the potential SOC (Soil Potential Carbon) stock for subsoil in 2100 (long term) under B1 IPCC emission scenario. It is function of re-spatialization of mean actual SOC stock for subsoil according to changes in land use and climate zone in 2100 under B1. Classes of stock are as below: - Very low (<10 Mg/ha); - Low (10-30 Mg/ha); - Medium (30-50 Mg/ha); - High (50-70 Mg/ha); - Very high (>70 Mg/ha).

This dataset represents the potential GAP in SOC (Soil Potential Carbon) stock for subsoil in 2050 (medium term) under A1FI IPCC emission scenario. GAP is expressed in terms of class differences between ACTUAL and POTENTIAL subsoil carbon sequestration under the same scenario ans time frame.

This map shows areas suitable for the Agricultural Water Management interventions as identified by the project. The assessment is based primarily on each intervention's bio-physical requirements (such as: climate, proximity to water resources, terrain), but it also includes rating based on socio-economic settings or infrastructure (namely distance to markets). Details of criteria and threshold used are given in the downloadable files.

The potential for investment in agricultural water management (AWM) in support to rural livelihoods is assessed as a function of the demand from rural population and the availability (supply) of the resource. This map shows the distribution of rural population who could benefit from water-related interventions. The level of demand is based on the analysis of the livelihood zones, combined with poverty level. The supply is a function of availability of water, calculated on the basis of water (Internal renewable water resources) per person, with water development being constrained below the threshold 1700 m3/p.

This dataset represents the potential SOC (Soil Potential Carbon) stock for subsoil in 2050 (medium term) under B1 IPCC emission scenario. It is function of re-spatialization of mean actual SOC stock for subsoil according to changes in land use and climate zone in 2050 under B1. Classes of stock are as below: - Very low (<10 Mg/ha); - Low (10-30 Mg/ha); - Medium (30-50 Mg/ha); - High (50-70 Mg/ha); - Very high (>70 Mg/ha).

This dataset represents the potential GAP in SOC (Soil Potential Carbon) stock for topsoil in 2050 (medium term) under A1FI IPCC emission scenario. GAP is expressed in terms of class differences between ACTUAL and POTENTIAL topsoil carbon sequestration under the same scenario ans time frame.

This map shows where AWM can be the entry point for improving livelihoods and where to prioritize investments in AWM to have the maximum impact on rural livelihoods. High potential areas are those showing the highest potential for AWM investment. These areas are identified on the basis of three guiding principles: 1) where water is available 2) where the target beneficiaries are mostly located; and 3) where water is key for livelihoods.